Taxpayer loses child benefit charge row in unusual circumstances
The First Tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal involving a divorced taxpayer who left the family home but continued to be liable for the high-income child benefit charge, but with some unusual circumstances. What happened?

Mr Meades (M) and his first wife had a child in 2012, but separated in July 2017 and divorced on 4 April 2019. During the 2019/20 tax year, M married his second wife, whom he lived with for the entire tax year. The divorced couple had received child benefit throughout - the amount being paid into M's first wife's account. HMRC assessed additional tax of £1,076 for Mr M in 2019/20, on the basis that the high income child benefit charge was due for the year. He appealed on the basis that he and his first wife were not partners per the legislation.
Unfortunately for M, he had made the original application in his name. Even though he had never received any of it and the child mainly lived with his ex-wife, the claim was still in his name. The appeal was dismissed.
The better thing to do would have been for M's ex-wife to take over the claim. She could then continue to receive the payments with no charge on M.
Related Topics
-
What’s a trivial benefit worth to employers?
The tax and NI exemption for trivial benefits is much misunderstood, but nonetheless very useful to employers. When can you use it, what are its advantages and are there any pitfalls to watch out for?
-
Should you agree to your customer’s self-billing request?
A customer wants to adopt a self-billing system, meaning they will issue invoices on your behalf and charge VAT or otherwise. Can you refuse their request and what are the risks of accepting?
-
Travel expenses - exempt or not?
You have several employees who travel from home or their workplace in the course of doing their job. Naturally, you meet the cost of their travel but should you be deducting tax and NI from the payments, or are they exempt?